RE: Myth of loose coupling

"Champion, Mike" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch
Message-ID <[email protected]>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Baker [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 9:39 AM
> To: Walden Mathews
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Myth of loose coupling
> 
> 
> 
> +1.  I was going to respond to Mike, but this says more or less what I
> wanted to say.
> 
> Though I detest the expression, there really is a "paradigm shift" to
> understanding why GET+URI is superior to POST+method.  For most people
> coming from a CORBA/DCOM-like background (like myself), it takes a
> "eureka moment", if you know what I mean.

Well, I considered myself a RESTifarian until I realized that y'all wanted
me accept the catechism that included the "uniform interface constraint" and
the categorical superiority of URIs over XML :-)   Again, these are tools
that engineers can use to optimize solutions that are adapted to specific
problems, IMHO.  I much appreciate the work that RESTifarians have done to
educate people on the limitations of the RPC paradigm over the Internet and
on the desiriability of fully leveraging the Web rather than just tunneling
a bunch of stuff through port 80.  I see that more of a kick in the shins
than a religious epiphany, however.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.