RE: Myth of loose coupling
"Champion, Mike" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jean-Jacques Dubray [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 10:11 AM > To: 'Champion, Mike'; [email protected] > Subject: RE: Myth of loose coupling > > It would certainly help to elevate the debate at the > metamodel level and > establish a mapping to technological concepts such as GET, > URI and POST. > A picture being worth more than a thousand words on this list, I would > suggest to illustrate it with UML class diagrams. That sounds like a good way forward! Sure, anyone want to propose some pictures? And don't even THINK about starting a tangential thread on the value of UML :-) Don't like UML, draw some other picture using whatever discipline you want.