RE: RM and Intermediaries
"Burdett, David" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <C1E0143CD365A445A4417083BF6F42CC053D169B@C1plenaexm07.commerceone.com> |
Ugo, you wrote ... >>>I got an extensive response from David Burdett at [1], which you might want to look at... ... thanks for remembering. I do wish that I had more time to devote to this thread as RM is an area I am interested in. Unfortunately, other demands on my time prevent me from devoting much attention to the many thoughtful emails that have been written on this subject. Best wishes to all and I hope the F2F was a success! David -----Original Message----- From: Ugo Corda [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 4:50 PM To: Ricky Ho; [email protected] Subject: RE: RM and Intermediaries Last month I raised a similar issue, and I got an extensive response from David Burdett at [1], which you might want to look at. Ugo [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Dec/0095.html > -----Original Message----- > From: Ricky Ho [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 7:50 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RM and Intermediaries > > > > Lets say S is the sender endpoint, R is the receiver > endpoint, and i1, i2 > are intermediaries that pre-process the message. > > S --> i1 --> i2 --> R > > Do i1 and i2 have to understand RM ? or RM is just an end-to-end > handshaking between S and R ? If so, can S pick a different > path in its > message resend ? > > Rgds, Ricky > >