Re: WS-Arch Glossary Organization

Hugo Haas <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch
Organization World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
Message-ID <[email protected]>
* Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) <[email protected]> [2003-02-03 13:27-0600]
> It seems to me that the separation of the glossary into functional
> sections (Architecture, General, Roles, etc) has some problems of
> consistency.   Some terms might apply to more than one section.  And,
> conversely (I think), some closely related terms migh split between
> sections in a way that makes their relationship less clear.

I originally tried to categorize terms to make the document clearer,
but I agree with you that it is not perfect.

> Suggestions:
> 
> 1 - Use some fancy client-side script technique that will reorder the
> terms either by category or overall alphabetically.
> 
> 2 - Order the main table alphabetically but provide a separate list by
> category that links to the alphabetic list.  Could one write an XSL
> stylesheet that would automate this?  (Probably depends on who the "one"
> is and how consistently the main table is tagged, I guess).

All your suggestions seem to be tools to achieve two orderings for the
document: one by category, one alphabetically.

We have the tools for doing so (DOM, XSLT, ...), but I think that one
thing that we should first agree on is a set of categories which makes
sense.

As you said, the current one is sub-optimal, and it seems that it will
be hard to limit every term to only one category.

The current list is[1]:

  2 Architectural Terms
  3 General Terms
  4 Choreography definitions
  5 Roles
  6 Service Properties
  7 SOAP Specific Definitions
      7.1 Protocol Concepts 
      7.2 Data Encapsulation Concepts
      7.3 Message Sender and Receiver Concepts
  8 Security and Privacy Related Terms
  9 Management Terms

The difference between 2, 3 and 5 is blurry. 4 may have to go back
into the {2,3,5} set at some point. 6, 7, 8 and 9 seem to be good
separate categories on the other hand.

Maybe we could look into reuniting {2,3,5}, give it a name, and see if
it would make more sense.

Regards,

Hugo

  1. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/arch/glossary/wsa-glossary.html
-- 
Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:[email protected] - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.