Re: FW [from WSD list]: HTTP Binding Issues

FYI, I just sent this response;

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Feb/0030.html

which said;

] I also wanted to point out issue 64, which was submitted after that
] summary was composed;
] 
] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.html#x64
] 
] I believe its implications are relevant to the HTTP binding, the WSDL
] binding mechanism, and other application protocol bindings, as I
] described last month;
] 
] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0103
] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0111
] 
] FWIW, its relationship to issue 53 is quite interesting; in order
] for WSDL to fully support application protocols, it's not enough
] to merely permit an operation to be associated with a "verb", but
] what's needed is for the WSDL operation to *be* the verb.

MB
-- 
Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca
Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis