Re: Architectural Roles document updated

David Booth <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch
Message-ID <5.1.0.14.2.20030218173243.02c36c10@localhost>
At 03:30 PM 2/13/2003 +0100, Jean-Jacques Moreau wrote:
>One more comment: where does Google fit on scenario 0? The disovery agent 
>is explicit on scenario T; but isn't it implicit on scenario 0? What did I 
>miss?

You are correct, Google isn't in Scenario 0.  Scenario 0 is simply included 
as a point of departure for explaining Scenario 1, which is a scenario in 
which the two parties are already known to each other, and thus do not need 
to discover each other.

It would be possible to add a Scenario 0b that would model the case in 
which the client uses Google to discover an appropriate Web site, but I 
didn't bother to do that, because the purpose of the document is to focus 
on Web services -- not conventional Web interactions -- and understand the 
roles that are needed under various Web services scenarios.

>Jean-Jacques.
>
>David Booth wrote:
>>See:
>>http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/arch/2/10/roles_clean.htm#scenario0_current_web 
>>(Scenario 0)
>>http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/arch/2/10/roles_clean.htm#scenariot_triangle_diagram 
>>(Scenario T)
>
>--
>David Booth
>W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
>Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.