Re: Resource definition
Bill de hÓra <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch |
|---|---|
| Organization | Propylon |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
James M Snell wrote: > The *act* of flipping the switch is *not* a resource. The *protocol* that > defines how to flip the switch *is* a resource. I this one just goes round and round. If you wanted to name such an act (say in an ontology or for a logic) and did so using a URI, then its a resource. Mark Baker points out that maybe naming that action doesn't buy you much, but it could buy someone something (say in an ontology or for a logic), so i ddi see any reason to disallow the possibility. Bill de hÓra