RE: Visibility (was Re: Introducing the Service Oriented Architec tural style, and it's constraints and properties.
"Champion, Mike" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Baker [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 8:58 PM > To: Christopher B Ferris > Cc: '[email protected] ' > Subject: Re: Visibility (was Re: Introducing the Service Oriented > Architec tural style, and it's constraints and properties. > > > Whoa, where'd that last part come from? Reference please. I agree > that protocol independance is a good thing, but not such that there's > no semantic difference between using HTTP and SMTP, for example. Of > couse there's a difference; they're different applications. > Whoa yourself :-) If a SOAP message has a semantic difference if it is transported (I use the term deliberately) over SMTP than if it is POSTed over HTTP (or send on a floppy disk by sneakernet), then some deep requirement of WSA (and SOAP 1.2, IIRC) is not being met.