RE: A Priori Information (Was Snapshot of Web Services Glossary )

"Assaf Arkin" <[email protected]> Wed, 26 Feb 2003 13:59:05 -0800

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch
Message-ID	<[email protected]>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 12:52 PM
> To: Assaf Arkin; David Orchard; Hugo Haas
> Cc: David Booth; [email protected]; Mark Baker
> Subject: RE: A Priori Information (Was Snapshot of Web Services Glossary
> )
>
> Is there anyone who REALLY wants and cares about the use of "a priori"
> as opposed to "prior" in the charter and the requirements?  If not, can
> we possibly declare this argument to be moot?

To summarize my verbiage, I support your position.

Easier to use a simpler term then spend the whole day discussing Midieval
Latin ;-)