Re: Business Preotocol (was: Application Protocol Definition)
bhaugen <[email protected]> Thu, 27 Feb 2003 16:32:48 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <006001c2deb0$28bbc580$b8eafea9@PC1> |
James M Snell wrote: > The term "business protocols" as I've been using it would encompass the > broad family of technology-independent business protocols available. > RosettaNet PIP 3A4, ebXML BPSS would all fall under this category so we're > not usurping anything. Sorry about the word "usurp", sounded like an accusation. If you use the same word for the technology-independent business protocol and also the technical implementations, won't that be confusing?