RE: FW: Reliable Messaging Summary
"Abbie Barbir" <[email protected]> Wed, 5 Mar 2003 11:29:06 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, I tiotally agree here. abbie -----Original Message----- From: Christopher B Ferris [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 11:10 AM To: Geoff Arnold Cc: Martin Chapman; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: FW: Reliable Messaging Summary +1 Christopher Ferris Architect, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture email: [email protected] phone: +1 508 234 3624 Geoff Arnold <[email protected]> Sent by: [email protected] 03/05/2003 10:26 AM To Martin Chapman <[email protected]> cc [email protected] Subject Re: FW: Reliable Messaging Summary +1 On Wednesday, March 5, 2003, at 10:09 AM, Martin Chapman wrote: > agreed but the mechanism for describing and negotiating should not be > specific to reliability. Other qualtities can use the same framework, > and dare I suggest a ws-policy like > framework needs to be part of our architecture.