RE: [ISSUES] Resolving Issue #23

Would it be possible to focus the issue more than is in the letter, a
good bit of which does indeed refer to the requirements?  In particular,
I personally would focus on the comments involving "context", which I
think are quite legitimate and valuable questions.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 10:09 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [ISSUES] Resolving Issue #23



Gentlebeings,

      In order finalize the resolution of issue #23 on the WSA issues
list, we need to create a new issue that contains the content of the
original issues #23, but is targeted at the Architecture document,
rather than the requirements. It is probably sufficient to simply copy
the original issue into the new one. This is in accordance with the
group's decision in the phone calls for Feb. 6 & 13th.
      I'd like the editors of the issues document to make these changes
and make issue #23 as resolved. The email response to Dr. Meurisse has
already been sent. Thanks!

Regards,

D-

*************************************************
Dr. Daniel Austin
Sr. Technical Architect / Architecture Team Lead
[email protected] <----- Note change! 847 793 5044 Visit
http://www.grainger.com

"If I get a little money, I buy books. If there is anything left over, I
buy clothing and food." -Erasmus