Re: [Sigia-l] User Experience Deliverables
Victor Lombardi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.sigia |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Peter wrote: > > Jeffery Callender and I collaborated on this article... > > http://semanticstudios.com/publications/semantics/000228.php Very interesting Peter, there's a lot of good ideas here to ponder. My first and biggest reaction though, is that while it's common to call these artifacts "deliverables" I prefer to call them documents. I deliver software and systems, just as an architect delivers a building or similar. I don't mean to play semantics, it actually has a lot of ramifications for our field. If, in the future, better tools make those documents mostly unnecessary, IAs who define their value by their documents will face a difficult adaptation (or not). Imagine an architect who says, "Here's your blueprints and renderings, my work is done here." Also, my spell checker wags its finger at me when I type "deliverables" and I tend to agree with her. Best, Victor ------------ IA Summit 2009: Peabody Hotel in Memphis Pre cons on March 18 and 19 Sessions on March 20, 21, 22 ----- When replying, please *trim your post* as much as possible. *Plain text, please; NO Attachments Searchable Archive at http://www.info-arch.org/lists/sigia-l/ ________________________________________ Sigia-l mailing list -- post to: [email protected] Changes to subscription: http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigia-l