Re: [Sigia-l] Automated Online Card Sorting Tools?
"Sabharwal, Arjun" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.sigia |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <89DC4DA62A40024DB7C7B044FFEA43EA04AEF0BD@MSG01CV00.utad.utoledo.edu> |
Greetings! I agree with Andrew: a manual card sort works best. It will produce results most suited to your organization because this process is typically intersubjective and interdisciplinary, as it engages people with perspectives and specializations that make your organization unique. Here is an article I read some time ago. I think, this approach can be adopted for a variety of organizations: Duncan, J., and Holliday, W. (2008, July). The role of information Architecture in designing a third-generation library Web site. College & Research Libraries, 69 (4), 301-316. http://ftrf.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/publications/crljournal/2008/jul/crljuly08ab.cfm (click on the PDF link to read the article) And there is also this: What's in a Name? Using Card Sorting to Evaluate Branding in an Academic Library's Web Site Peter Hepburn and Krystal M. Lewis http://ftrf.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/publications/crljournal/2008/may/May08.cfm (PDF also available) Regards, -- Arjun Arjun Sabharwal Digital Initiatives Librarian/Assistant Professor Carlson Library Mail Stop #509 University of Toledo Toledo, Ohio 43606-3390 419.530.2321/530.4497 email: [email protected] -------------------------- Message: 4 Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 12:43:38 +1100 From: Andrew Boyd <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Sigia-l] Automated Online Card Sorting Tools? To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 10:53 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > We are aware of Optimal Sort, was wondering if there are others that > anyone would recommend. Looking for low or no cost solutions that work > well and are easy to use (of course!). Purpose is to demonstrate card > sorting to an interdisciplinary team consisting of folks with and > without online UX experience. We want to be able to aggregate input from > between 10-25 users for a single project. > > Judith, an observation: complicated is easy :) Easy to use usually costs more to produce (and depending on the business model, usually costs more for the customer to access). A suggestion, made in the full knowledge that I do not know for sure if it fits your circumstances: demonstrate card sorting manually (with physical cards) to sell them on the process, and then there may be more funding support for tools that help to automate the process. Best regards, Andrew -- --- Andrew Boyd http://uxaustralia.com.au <http://uxaustralia.com.au/> -- UX Australia Conference Canberra 2009 http://uxbookclub.org <http://uxbookclub.org/> -- connect, read, discuss http://govux.org <http://govux.org/> -- the government user experience forum ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Sigia-l mailing list [email protected] http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigia-l End of Sigia-l Digest, Vol 53, Issue 4 ************************************** ------------ IA Summit 2009: Peabody Hotel in Memphis Pre cons on March 18 and 19 Sessions on March 20, 21, 22 ----- When replying, please *trim your post* as much as possible. *Plain text, please; NO Attachments Searchable Archive at http://www.info-arch.org/lists/sigia-l/ ________________________________________ Sigia-l mailing list -- post to: [email protected] Changes to subscription: http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigia-l