Re: [Sigia-l] How do you perceive Tweets?

Depends how you perceive tweets - which I suppose is what the research is
looking at. It never occurred to me to group them according to whether they
had links, images or re-tweets. I went for "frivolous", "actionable" and
"informative" myself. So that's how I perceive tweets, perhaps.


On 17 April 2013 14:17, Paola Kathuria <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 17 Apr 2013, at 10:47, Isabella Peters <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > Participate in our study and find out if you are a lemming or a lonesome
> > wolf:
> >
> > <http://userpages.uni-koblenz.de/~jhunz/experiment/>
> > http://userpages.uni-koblenz.de/~jhunz/experiment/
> >
> > Our experiment is about Twitter. By participating in our experiment, you
> > will find out how you perceive the content of tweets.
>
>
> I'd be interested to know the reason and rationale of this experiment.
>
> The method implies that there is a grouping - won't that bias the results?
> Also, since grouping tweets is not something people do, won't the obvious
> thing be to group tweets with links, images, retweets? And, if that is what
> you get in the results, what does that say about tweets?
>
>
> Paola
>
>
> ------------
> 2013  IA Summit
> April 4 - 7, 2013
> Baltimore Marriott Waterfront, MD
> -----
> When replying, please *trim your post* as much as possible.
> *Plain text, please; NO Attachments
>
> Searchable Archive at http://www.info-arch.org/lists/sigia-l/
> ________________________________________
> Sigia-l mailing list -- post to: [email protected]
> Changes to subscription: http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigia-l
>
>
------------
2013  IA Summit
April 4 - 7, 2013
Baltimore Marriott Waterfront, MD
-----
When replying, please *trim your post* as much as possible.
*Plain text, please; NO Attachments

Searchable Archive at http://www.info-arch.org/lists/sigia-l/
________________________________________
Sigia-l mailing list -- post to: [email protected]
Changes to subscription: http://mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigia-l