Re: Progress on Sitemesh?
"Joe Walnes" <[email protected]> Fri, 8 Dec 2006 13:30:46 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.sitemesh.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
------=_Part_92272_15791969.1165584646991 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline We're still here! In the past few years, we've found the need to change very little. SiteMesh has been remarkably stable for a long time. Saying that, we silently released a new version a few weeks ago - we just haven't announced it yet. Okay, I guess we have now :) Grab SiteMesh 2.3 here: https://sitemesh.dev.java.net/servlets/ProjectDocumentList?folderID=6239&expandFolder=6239&folderID=0 It's biggest change is a brand new HTML parser, which is faster, cleaner, robuster and more extensible. -j On 12/7/06, Smiley, Stuart A. <[email protected]> wrote: > > Martin, > > The basic sitemesh functionality has been working very well for me the > past couple of years. I think the project committers are very busy people > and have to prioritize their work accordingly. In the case of sitemesh, > take the lack of activity as a good sign. > > Stuart > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected] > ]On Behalf Of Martin Jonsson > Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 9:00 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Opensymphony-sitemesh] Progress on Sitemesh? > > > I just recently heard of Sitemesh when attending a developer conference i > Malmoe / Sweden. Erik Dornenburg from ThoughtWorks made a presentation about > Automated Web Testing with Selenium and he also demonstrated Sitemesh that > was used in the demo application. It looked very neat and promising then, > and when I tried it out for myself I was thrilled. But it is very > discouraging to see that the Sitemesh project is more or less abandoned - > the latest version was released 10/08/2004 ... Not that much activity in the > forums either. > > Is there any chance we will see a new release any time soon? 3.0? 2.3? > 2.2.2? Anything..? > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Posted via Jive Forums > > http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=52419&messageID=105761#105761 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > ------=_Part_92272_15791969.1165584646991 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline We're still here! In the past few years, we've found the need to change very little. SiteMesh has been remarkably stable for a long time.<br><br>Saying that, we silently released a new version a few weeks ago - we just haven't announced it yet. Okay, I guess we have now :) <br><br>Grab SiteMesh 2.3 here: <a href="https://sitemesh.dev.java.net/servlets/ProjectDocumentList?folderID=6239&expandFolder=6239&folderID=0">https://sitemesh.dev.java.net/servlets/ProjectDocumentList?folderID=6239&expandFolder=6239&folderID=0 </a><br>It's biggest change is a brand new HTML parser, which is faster, cleaner, robuster and more extensible.<br><br>-j<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 12/7/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Smiley, Stuart A.</b> <<a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Martin,<br><br>The basic sitemesh functionality has been working very well for me the past couple of years. I think the project committers are very busy people and have to prioritize their work accordingly. In the case of sitemesh, take the lack of activity as a good sign. <br><br>Stuart<br><br>-----Original Message-----<br>From: <a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a><br>[mailto:<a href="mailto:[email protected]"> [email protected]</a><br>]On Behalf Of Martin Jonsson<br>Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 9:00 AM<br>To: <a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected] </a><br>Subject: [Opensymphony-sitemesh] Progress on Sitemesh?<br><br><br>I just recently heard of Sitemesh when attending a developer conference i Malmoe / Sweden. Erik Dornenburg from ThoughtWorks made a presentation about Automated Web Testing with Selenium and he also demonstrated Sitemesh that was used in the demo application. It looked very neat and promising then, and when I tried it out for myself I was thrilled. But it is very discouraging to see that the Sitemesh project is more or less abandoned - the latest version was released 10/08/2004 ... Not that much activity in the forums either. <br><br>Is there any chance we will see a new release any time soon? 3.0? 2.3? 2.2.2? Anything..?<br>---------------------------------------------------------------------<br>Posted via Jive Forums<br><a href="http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=52419&messageID=105761#105761"> http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=52419&messageID=105761#105761</a><br><br>---------------------------------------------------------------------<br>To unsubscribe, e-mail: <a href="mailto:[email protected]"> [email protected]</a><br>For additional commands, e-mail: <a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a><br></blockquote></div><br> ------=_Part_92272_15791969.1165584646991--