Re: skunkweb bug tracker

Agree - just followed this new 'good practice' (a small thing I'll look
into over the weekend when I've a bit more time) and noticed that there
aren't any categories or groups defined.

If we're going to use the tracker more seriously this might not be a bad
idea. E.g. one category for each Service or something? Some other
projects (e.g. compiere) seem to use 'category' for a specific part of
the software and 'group' for the releasenumber, which makes sense to me.

Must be set by a projectadmin - Jacob/Drew?

Rgds,
Jeroen

On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 21:34, Brian Olsen - Lists wrote:
> Just a note that it would be much help if we shoved all our bug reports 
> into the sourceforge bug tracker. at least for myself, I will be 
> looking at it more frequently now. i got a few to add (which I am going 
> to work on myself anyway) but at least some of these wily bugs will be 
> reported in a single place. Also, it makes it look like skunkweb is not 
> floating dead in the water. More open/closed bugs + feature requests 
> makes the project look alive and kicking!
> 
> Brian
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN's Audience Survey.
> Help shape OSDN's sites and tell us what you think. Take this
> five minute survey and you could win a $250 Gift Certificate.
> http://www.wrgsurveys.com/2003/osdntech03.php?site=8
> _______________________________________________
> Skunkweb-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/skunkweb-list


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click