authentication/authorization
Frank Tegtmeyer <[email protected]> Tue, 07 Jun 2005 22:39:12 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.skunkweb |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi all (after a long time :), as I start to work with skunkweb again I would like to know which approach you experts choose if you have to implement closed areas in a website, possibly with different levels of users rights (speak: how to do authorization?). My first (two years old but still working) approach was to require authentication through a scope configuration in sw.conf. The components then check that parameters are valid for the given user. This is not very handy and subject to errors (you may forget the check, of course). I wonder if there isn't a more general approach to make components react according to a given security policy and a security level derived from the users authentication. A check against security requirements derived from the scope or some other source would be great. Because some of you developed big sites with skunkweb I'm sure there is a reusable general strategy. From the docs I found the auth service with the (misnamed) authorizer class - misnamed because it does authentication, not authorization. But it only does authentication, so it isn't the answer to my question. Zope does authorization based on a starting point in the object tree by matching roles against (required) rights. Ist there something similar that can be plugged into skunkweb? Regards, Frank ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. How far can you shotput a projector? How fast can you ride your desk chair down the office luge track? If you want to score the big prize, get to know the little guy. Play to win an NEC 61" plasma display: http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20