Two questions about cache
Andreas Kaempf <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.skunkweb |
|---|---|
| Organization | Soundience, Ltd. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
First of all, thanks and appreciation to Drew, Jacob and other contributors for developing and sharing such a superb piece of software. Coming from the opaque mysteries of Zope, I am finding the transparency, simplicity, and power of SkunkWeb refreshing. It really deserves to be better known. I am developing a site that includes news articles with threaded comments, all pulled from a database, and was wondering whether there was a way of programmatically invalidating a page's cache. Basically, the cached version should be valid until we know a change has been made (i.e., an article has been added or a comment added). It would be nice to be able to say "this page has been changed, refresh anew next time requested" rather than relying on a time interval. My second question was whether it is safe to delete the contents of /usr/local/skunk/cache occasionally during development to force pages to be generated fresh, rather than from cache. I'm finding that components called from components are sometimes drawn from cache even if the source file has been changed. Many thanks, Andreas Kaempf London, England ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click