Re: reply>> my first newbie question
Drew Csillag <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.skunkweb |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--- Jacob Smullyan <[email protected]> wrote: > Perhaps we can add a configure test that checks for this and use > mtime > for platforms that give creation-time semantics for ctime. I seem > to > recall that there was a reason ctime was preferable to use than > mtime, > but I've forgotten what it was. Drew, do you remember our > discussion > of this back in 2001? For some reason, I think we used to use mtime, but we found that in some situation, it didn't do the right thing on whatever machine we were using at the time (no, I cannot imagine being more vague :) I would think we should just use the max of ctime/mtime in all cases, and we should be just fine, irrespective of the stupidity of the host platform, as a file change will change at least one of these. Drew __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/