Re: frozen value for discrete animation

"Dr. Olaf Hoffmann" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.smil
Organization Atomare Prozesse - Universität Hannover
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello,

I see, for multiples I learned the same as it is mentioned in
wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_(mathematics)

6 = 1.2*5 is not a multiple of 5, because 1.2 = 6/5 is no integer.

Multiple is always the result of a multiplication with an integer, 
and 6 = 1.2*5 is an integer multiple of 1.2, because 6/1.2 = 5 
and 6, the result of multiplication, is an (even!) integer again, 
therefore 6 can be called an even integer multiple of 1.2 too...

This 'even' wording looks very plurivalent to me, 
not very useful for an (international) recommendation...

The given formular is already a good improvement compared
to the 'SMIL Animation Recommendation 04-September-2001',
I really like this, but the 'even' wording may still confuse several 
people (as I learned already in a related discussion about frozen 
animation related to these emails about frozen discrete
animations). There is a similar wording in the time interval
model section too, still without formular and therefore even (!)
more confusing concerning this discrete problem.

Olaf Hoffmann


> By even multiple we intended that it was an integer multiple, with no
> fractional or partial multiple result.  We should probably have said
> "integer multiple". To be really precise we would have to specify an
> (integer>0) multiple.
>
> Our intent with "some" positive integer is "any". This is an English
> expression, common in mathematical descriptions. Sorry for any confusion.
>
> Patrick
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.