Feedback on the SMIL 3.0 LCWD specification from the Multimodal Interaction WG LC 1834, LC 1835, LC 1836

Kazuyuki,

During the discussion with the Multi-modal WG at the TPAc we have
discussed general terms about integration issues.

The resolution was that you would send us a number of representative use
cases for identify requirements on integration issues, but we have not
received these yet.

There are 3 LC comments for which we have send resolutions and for which
we need your agreement.

Please acknowledge our response.

The resolutions are:
LC 1834: "this comments do not require any modification in SMIL 3.0; the
resolution is to held an inter-workpackage meeting in order to further
discuss the different alternatives of integration"
which was held

LC 1835: a number of changes in the specs (already done) as specified in
the response comment (see previous email for response from the SYMM WG).

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-smil/2007OctDec/0075.html

LC 1836:
The Working Group agrees that using IRIs instead of URIs is a good thing
and has resolved to adopt the proposal.

We will add a (normative) note that the term URI needs to be read as IRI
throughout the specification.

Your initial comment is available at.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-smil/2007JulSep/0068.html



On behalf of the SYMM WG,
Thierry Michel