[Timesheets LC comment] Relationships to Other Specifications

Dear SYMM WG-

This is a Last Call review comment from the SVG WG on the SMIL 
Timesheets 1.0 specification, W3C Working Draft 10 January 2008, 
http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-timesheets-20080110/ .  Please let us know 
if you have any questions by replying to [email protected].


1 Introduction

"An alternative to Timesheets is XHTML+SMIL [XHTMLplusSMIL] which gives 
full SMIL functionality as in-line in non-SMIL XML documents. On the 
other hand, SMIL itself gives full SMIL functionality as in-line 
XML-based document."

The wording here is unclear, and seems to undermine the need for 
timesheets when XHTML+SMIL already exists.  Can you please clarify?  The 
first example seems to imply that timesheets can be used inline or 
externally, but this passages seems to counterindicate that.

Also, what is the relationship of Timesheets and XHTML+SMIL to 
HTML+Time? [1]

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-HTMLplusTIME




Regards-
-Doug Schepers, on behalf of the SVG WG