Re: Timesheets - UA Capability Detection
"Jeff Schiller" <[email protected]> Wed, 14 May 2008 11:10:44 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.smil |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Jack and SYMM WG, Can we have a response on this - would it be possible to include a mention of the SMIL Timesheet feature string in the Timesheet spec and a reference to the DOM hasFeature method? Seems like http://www.w3.org/2007/07/SMIL30/Timesheets would make the most sense. Thanks, Jeff On 4/8/08, Jeff Schiller <[email protected]> wrote: > > Jack, > > http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-2-Core/core.html#ID-5CED94D7 is the DOM > hasFeature method. It mentions how the SVG did things, which is here: > http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/feature.html and > http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/svgdom.html#FeatureStrings > > Regards, > Jeff > > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 4:06 AM, Jack Jansen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On 8 apr 2008, at 07:50, Jeff Schiller wrote: >> >>> Thanks, Cameraon for the suggestion. >>> >>> SYMM Working Group, >>> >>> Can we have a response on this? I think the feature string hasFeature() >>> check is a good idea, but the feature string would need to be defined in the >>> spec. "org.w3.smil.timesheet" ? >>> >> >> >> Jeff, >> do you have examples of other specs that have such a reference? The >> suggested functionality sounds pretty useful, but it would fall under a >> "best practices" or "integration suggestions" heading, and we haven't done >> such before... >> -- >> Jack Jansen, <[email protected]>, http://www.cwi.nl/~jack<http://www.cwi.nl/%7Ejack> >> If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma >> Goldman >> >> >> >