Re: request for change handling hostStrictVerify

Amos Jeffries <[email protected]> Tue, 2 Nov 2021 01:01:40 +1300
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.squid.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 1/11/21 20:59, kk wrote:
> 
> On Saturday, October 30, 2021 01:14 GMT, Alex Rousskov wrote:
>> On 10/29/21 8:37 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> > On 30/10/21 11:09, Alex Rousskov wrote:
>> >> On 10/26/21 5:46 PM, kk wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> - Squid enforces the Client to use SNI
>> >>> - Squid lookup IP for SNI (DNS resolution).
>> >>> - Squid forces the client to go to the resolved IP
>> >>

>  >then malicious applets will escape browser IP-based protections.
> Browser should perform IP-based protection on browser(client) level and 
> should therefor not traverse squid.

Your suggestion of making Squid "forces the client to go to the resolved 
IP" bypasses any protections the Browser might do.

This would make the CVE-2009-0801 situation happen all over again. Just 
with SNI as the bypass method instead of Host header.

Amos