Re: request for change handling hostStrictVeri fy
[email protected] Tue, 02 Nov 2021 09:25:43 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.squid.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <38-6180f600-5-7cdebb00@168115919> |
On Monday, November 01, 2021 14:58 GMT, Alex Rousskov <[email protected]> wrote: On 11/1/21 3:59 AM, [email protected] wrote: > On Saturday, October 30, 2021 01:14 GMT, Alex Rousskov wrote: >> >> AFAICT, in the majority of deployments, the mismatch between the >> >> intended IP address and the SNI/Host header can be correctly handled >> >> automatically and without creating serious problems for the user. Squid >> >> already does the right thing in some cases. Somebody should carefully >> >> expand that coverage to intercepted traffic. Frankly, I am somewhat >> >> surprised nobody has done that yet given the number of complaints! > Not sure what do you mean with "Somebody should carefully expand that > coverage to intercepted traffic"? I meant that somebody should create a high-quality pull request that modifies Squid source code to properly address the problem you, AFAICT, are suffering from. There is already code that handles similar situations correctly. Alex. Ok Alex, I will try to implement it. https://github.com/chifu1234/squid -- Kevin Klopfenstein Bellevuestrasse 103 3095 Spiegel, CH sudo-i.net _______________________________________________ squid-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-dev
smime.p7s
(application/x-pkcs7-signature, 5 KB) - not displayed