RFC: Class section/member order

Alex Rousskov <[email protected]> Thu, 23 Jun 2022 09:12:52 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.squid.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Spam detection software, running on the system "master.squid-cache.org",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.

Content preview:  Hello, Amos and I disagreed[1] regarding the existing guidelines
   for section/member order in C++ class declarations. To resolve that disagreement,
   this email proposes the order for future use. ----- 

Content analysis details:   (105.0 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 105 SQUID_ML_SPAM_01       No description available.
 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY      Informational: message has unparseable relay
                            lines
-0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE   No description available.

_______________________________________________
squid-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-dev
(unnamed) (message/rfc822, 4.1 KB) - not displayed