RFC: Class section/member order
Alex Rousskov <[email protected]> Thu, 23 Jun 2022 09:12:52 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.squid.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Spam detection software, running on the system "master.squid-cache.org",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Hello, Amos and I disagreed[1] regarding the existing guidelines
for section/member order in C++ class declarations. To resolve that disagreement,
this email proposes the order for future use. -----
Content analysis details: (105.0 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
105 SQUID_ML_SPAM_01 No description available.
0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay
lines
-0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available.
_______________________________________________
squid-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-dev
(unnamed)
(message/rfc822, 4.1 KB) - not displayed