Re: RFC: Removal of ESI Support from Squid

I use bump splice, with split acls and access lists that match MAC addresses, plus cachemgr, I hate to admit I am using 5.8 because 6.6 has issues with so many errors showing and is so much slower. I do not want to reissue all my certificates, it works perfect for what I need in my mini firewall. 

It took many many hours of config and years of testing and changes to get it to this level of performance. I was very happy that 6.6 was released but it broke a lot of the php gui tools. Again it is like 5.8 is an everything bagel, it’s protected behind a firewall so I am less concerned as well. I am not protecting a massive corporate environment, it is just home issue
Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 7, 2024, at 08:52, Amos Jeffries <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> The ESI (Edge Side Includes) feature of Squid has a growing number of unfixed bugs, more than a few are turning into security issues.
> 
> Also, the current Squid developers do not have spare brain cycles to maintain everything and v7 is seeing a lot more effort to prune away old and unused mechanisms in Squid.
> 
> 
> As such this is a callout to see how much use there is for this feature.
> 
> 
>      DO you need ESI in Squid?  Yes or No.
> 
>   Speak Now, or face regrets at upgrade time.
> 
> 
> 
> Thank You
> Amos
> 
> _______________________________________________
> squid-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users