Re: agenda+ css-writing-modes-3 review
fantasai <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.svg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10/05/2015 10:37 AM, Tavmjong Bah wrote: > > Hi, > > I've completed my review of the spec for issues 47 and 53 and have some > conclusions: Thank you very much, Tav, for your detailed analysis! > Issue 47: > > Over all the text looks fine. > > The 'note' in 3.1.1 I think should be removed. Done. > In 3.1.1.2, there seems to be an error in the UA stylesheet: it should > be 'horizontal-tb' not 'horizontal-tbl'. Fixed. > The discussion of 'glyph-orientation' appears to match what we decided > at the Paris 2015 FXTF meeting. Excellent. > Issue 53: > > I think the answer is yes. [...] Great! I have updated the spec as follows: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/diff/9787deded31d/css-writing-modes/Overview.bs https://drafts.csswg.org/css-writing-modes/#svg-writing-mode Let us know if this looks good, or if there are further edits that are warranted. ~fantasai