Re: semantic level of SVG usage
Rich Morin <[email protected]> Wed, 17 Aug 2016 22:40:00 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.svg,gmane.org.w3c.accessibility.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On Aug 17, 2016, at 22:13, Sean Murphy (seanmmur) <[email protected]> = wrote: > Is there any examples of accessible diagrams using SVG? ... My wiki page on accessible diagrams of graphs contains several versions of a seven-node graph: image, descriptive text, DOT, and Cypher. I = don't know how well any of these approaches would scale to a larger graph. What I can say is that most diagrams of graphs become hard to interpret visually as the number of nodes increases past a dozen or so. With very few exceptions (e.g., architectural and circuit diagrams, maps), a graph with more than 100 nodes mostly results in "wow, isn't that = complicated". So, my take is that some sort of interactive navigation is the only real answer to absorbing large graphs. That said, feel free to give feedback on the versions in the page: http://wiki.cfcl.com/Projects/AxAp/Graphs And, if you think of anything that might work better, bring it up! -r --=20 http://www.cfcl.com/rdm Rich Morin [email protected] http://www.cfcl.com/rdm/resume San Bruno, CA, USA +1 650-873-7841 Software system design, development, and documentation