Re: Incremental segfault in economy mode yo!
Peter Karman <[email protected]> Sat, 19 Aug 2006 13:02:35 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.swish-e |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
brad miele scribbled on 8/18/06 1:27 PM: > Hello everyone, Hi Brad. Hope that Maine weather is fine. > I have been messing around with incrimental, which i know is > "experimental" (how long will it be experimental anyway?). Guess it'll be experimental as long as it keeps doing things like what you're describing. :) But i had > not been getting very far because it seems that the swish-es that i build > with --enable-incrimental have this tendency to segfault during the > indexing part of things: > > Writing header ... > Writing index entries ... > Writing word text: ...Segmentation fault (core dumped) > > then today, i noticed that if if i didn't use economy mode, things work. > so is economy mode and incrimental generally a show stopper? i can through > more resources at it in that case i guess. and yeah. incrimental in > general.. yes? no? i want to start letting our editors adjust the index in > near real time, and we have about 1.5 million records now. Is it reproducible for a small set of docs? (<100) Could you put together a test? The way to track this down is to run it through gdb or similar to find where it's segfaulting. There's been talk off and on about getting a good test suite together for the incremental index feature, but as its chief author is no longer on the list, there's little momentum there. -- Peter Karman . http://peknet.com/ . [email protected]