Re: MetaNamesRank

I think it works in 2.4.3 what we're using.

I use

MetaNamesRank 10 title
MetaNamesRank 8 description
MetaNamesRank 6 h1 h2 h3

in an effort to promote structured html files over office and PDF
documents which tend to be much longer than the average html document,
but so far the office and PDF docs keep occupying the top ranks of the
SERP.

Cas


On 9/10/06, Deane Barker <[email protected]> wrote:
> Did MetaNamesRank ever get implemented?  I've searched for this answer, but
> I can't find a definitive yes or no anywhere in the list.
>
> I ask because I have indexed my content with MetaNamesRank enabled and
> without, and the search result ordering doesn't change at all.
>
> Here's what I'm using:
>
> MetaNamesRank 3 swishtitle
> MetaNamesRank 0 swishdefault
> MetaNamesRank 4 keywords
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Deane
>
>
>
> *********************************************************************
> Due to deletion of content types excluded from this list by policy,
> this multipart message was reduced to a single part, and from there
> to a plain text message.
> *********************************************************************
>


-- 
Bookmark  http://kayakfun.info/salsagids/  voor de beste salsafeestjes!