RE: [MACCAWS] Webmonkey article: Web Standards for Hard Times
"Ryan Christensen" <[email protected]> Wed, 7 Aug 2002 11:58:41 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.vkit |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <001301c23e44$7231a6b0$07d9c141@RYAN> |
This brings up a point: As it was said on diveintomark.org (http://diveintomark.org/archives/2002/08/05.html#rounded_corners) regarding the css box-corners template that was whipped up (http://www.albin.net/CSS/roundedCorners/) and mentioned on css-d/etc. -------------------- But I count three CSS hacks, two levels of nested divs, one markup hack, and a partridge in a pear tree to get it all working. Apparently we've traded a big stinking pile of table tricks for a big stinking pile of CSS tricks. It's not more semantically pure, it's not more accessible, it's not easier to maintain. Why is this progress? -------------------- He has a very good point here. What I'm asking is: Should we be pushing workarounds/hacks to work WITH the older browsers, or settle with (possibly) less visually appealing & precise layouts which ARE cleanly laid out but still remain W3C compliant. Thoughts? Am I even making sense? ;) Ryan