RE: [MACCAWS] Webmonkey article: Web Standards for Hard Times

"Ryan Christensen" <[email protected]> Wed, 7 Aug 2002 11:58:41 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.vkit
Message-ID <001301c23e44$7231a6b0$07d9c141@RYAN>
This brings up a point:

As it was said on diveintomark.org
(http://diveintomark.org/archives/2002/08/05.html#rounded_corners)
regarding the css box-corners template that was whipped up
(http://www.albin.net/CSS/roundedCorners/) and mentioned on css-d/etc.

--------------------
But I count three CSS hacks, two levels of nested divs, one markup hack,
and a partridge in a pear tree to get it all working. Apparently we've
traded a big stinking pile of table tricks for a big stinking pile of
CSS tricks. It's not more semantically pure, it's not more accessible,
it's not easier to maintain. Why is this progress?
--------------------

He has a very good point here. What I'm asking is: Should we be pushing
workarounds/hacks to work WITH the older browsers, or settle with
(possibly) less visually appealing & precise layouts which ARE cleanly
laid out but still remain W3C compliant.

Thoughts? Am I even making sense? ;)

Ryan