Re: [MACCAWS] largest compliant site

> I'm not aware of one listing purely commercial ones.
> 
> Would this be a good thing to throw together for MACCAWS..?
> 
> I'd have though the best way to do it would be to allow anyone to add
> a site (but they would *have* to validate), let anyone flag sites as
> either non-commercial or non-compliant, and then allow a group of
> moderators to do the final editing.


yes, I would think it'd have to go through an editor, but we'd also have to 
have a "valid on this date" decleration. Sites, change, contents get updated, 
valid code becomes invalid... out-of-date, or no-longer-relevant content is 
annoying on a site isn't it? we don't want that...

maybe some genius could write a script that would interogate our list of valid 
urls against the w3c validator and flag them for attention if they no longer 
validate?

---------------------------
Dorset, England
http://www.1976design.com/
http://www.orchard.it/
http://www.maccaws.org/