RE: State of the XPath datamodel tests
Jim Barnett <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.voice |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <57A15FAF9E58F841B2B1651FFE16D281039CE8@GENSJZMBX02.msg.int.genesyslab.com> |
Stefan, Do you mean specifically the tests for the XPath datamodel, or the larger set of tests when run on the XPath datamodel? In the former case, Johan's Spyderbrain system passes all the tests except 483 and 568. It passes almost all the tests in the latter case as well, but I don't remember which ones fail. This doesn't mean that there aren't problems in the tests, of course, but they should be in good enough shape to be worth debugging. - Jim -----Original Message----- From: Stefan Radomski [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 11:31 AM To: [email protected] ([email protected]) Subject: State of the XPath datamodel tests Hey there, I tried the last two days to get the xpath datamodel tests to pass and failed rather miserably. Are they in a state that can be implemented? That is, does any implementation pass them all or at least a significant subset? I am hesitant to write a detailed lists of inconsistencies in the tests only to realize that they are not considered to be implementable yet. Best regards Stefan