Re: Test 330 is missing SCXML namespace

I have fixed this and checked it in, but haven't been able to test it.  
I think that you're right about test298 as well, but will wait a day or 
two to see if anyone else has opinions before updating it.

I have added an appendix B listing these changes to the IR document.

On 6/18/2014 11:34 AM, Gavin Kistner wrote:
> test330.txml is missing
> xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/07/scxmlâ€
> on the root element.
>
> (The LXSC parser considers the namespace of elements when creating an internal representation, so elements like <state> become generic unrecognized wrappers instead of smart entities.)

-- 
Jim Barnett
Genesys