Re: Missing SCXML Test Coverage

Sounds reasonable to me. Please let us know when these have been added, and I’ll update my converter to match.

On Jul 1, 2014, at 9:28 AM, Jim Barnett <[email protected]> wrote:

> On this point, though, I think you're right.  We should add tests for <assign> with child  content.  Tests 287 and 487 test <assign> with 'expr'.  I will add tests 287a and 487a that test with <content>.  Instead of adding <conf:content>, I think I'll add <conf:someVal> which can be a child of <content>.  Then I'll add conf:eventDataSomeVal and conf:idSomeVal that test that _event.data and the specified variable have whatever val was created by <conf:someVal>.  I will use <conf:someVal> in test354 as well.
> 
> On 6/30/2014 5:16 PM, Gavin Kistner wrote:
>> One feature that I know that LXSC does not support is not covered in the tests:
>> <assign> elements with child content instead of an expr attribute.
>> I'm not sure if there are others features not covered by
>>           tests.
>> 
>> 
>>         
>> Ideally every "must" in the specification would have at
>>           least one test file backing it.
> 
> -- 
> Jim Barnett
> Genesys