Re: SCXML test coverage
Zjnue Brzavi <[email protected]> Tue, 22 Jul 2014 21:36:58 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.voice |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABmmmmwCwqtKFzGEd2Ab8EaDuHU1peBfrub4cJVbL3PMjO_i5Q@mail.gmail.com> |
Thank you, +1 implementations passing test288. On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Jim Barnett <[email protected]> wrote: > Fixed. > > > On 7/22/2014 2:04 PM, Zjnue Brzavi wrote: > > > I've received 3 implementation reports so far, and have posted an >> updated IR Test plan document showing the results for each test. We have >> at least 2 passes for all mandatory tests except test288, which I just >> added a couple of weeks ago. If you have already submitted a report, could >> you consider running 288 and re-submitting? >> > > Hi, > The link to test288.txml seems dead: > http://www.w3.org/Voice/2013/scxml-irp/288/test288.txml > Zjnue > > > -- > Jim Barnett > Genesys >