Re: Spec column in SCXML IRP table

On Nov 7, 2014, at 13:58, Jim Barnett <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes, that's because I moved the algorithm later in the Appendices. It is =
now Appendix D, while it was A before.  So all Appendices  before D have mo=
ved up a letter.
>=20

I am sure that=92s true, nevertheless, this makes the =93Spec=94 column in =
the IRP table incorrect for quite a few tests :)

E.g. test436.txml is not testing a functional requirement from C.1 as indic=
ated in the table and the manifest from the IRP page, but from B.1. It=92s =
no big deal, the references still point to the correct section as the ancho=
rs are still correct, however, the section these anchors appear under are n=
ot correctly labeled.

Regards
Stefan

> - Jim
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefan Radomski [mailto:[email protected]]=20
> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2014 3:24 AM
> To: [email protected] ([email protected])
> Subject: Spec column in SCXML IRP table
>=20
> Hey there,
>=20
> Datamodels and IO Processors are shifted by one alphabet character in the=
 "Spec" column on the IRP page. Datamodels are "B", not "C" and IO processo=
rs are "C", not "D".
> Stefan
>=20
>=20