Re: test240.txml: Invalid target state in nested invoker
Jim Barnett <[email protected]> Tue, 25 Nov 2014 09:54:41 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.voice |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------000804090103010703070203
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
You're right. In the second invocation the final state is subFinal2.
I've fixed this.
- Jim
On 11/25/2014 7:15 AM, Stefan Radomski wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> in test240.txml for SCXML, there are two nested invokers. The second
> one references a target state subfinal1 in a transition, which is
> only defined in the first invoker:
> <transition target="subFinal1>
> I am pretty sure that this is an oversight?
> Stefan
--------------000804090103010703070203
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
You're right. In the second invocation the final state is
subFinal2. I've fixed this.<br>
<br>
- Jim<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/25/2014 7:15 AM, Stefan Radomski
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:AACF5AF3-20FD-4EBF-A20A-3821606C20B6@tk.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
Hi there,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>in test240.txml for SCXML, there are two nested invokers. The
second one references a target state subfinal1 in a
transition, which is only defined in the first invoker:</div>
<div>
<pre style="word-wrap: break-word; white-space: pre-wrap;"> <transition target="subFinal1></pre>
</div>
<div>I am pretty sure that this is an oversight?</div>
<div> Stefan</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------000804090103010703070203--