Re: How should this work <general>
Alex Rousskov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.web-polygraph.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.BSF.4.10.10009271153160.25773-100000@measurement-factory.com> |
Thomas, I would recommend that you use PolyMix-3 and the step-by-step instructions at http://www.measurement-factory.com/docs/PolyMix-3/ If you have to use PolyMix-2, try to follow these steps: http://bakeoff.ircache.net/N02/howto.txt It is difficult to say what is wrong with your setup based on the information you have supplied. Here are a few guesses that might help: - Polygraph does not understand FQDNs yet, only IP addresses must be used - If you have one PolyMix-2,3 robot only (one IP address), you will get 0.4 req/sec load at most; create more robots (preferrably via adding IP aliases) to increase the load - Make sure you can talk to Polygraph servers from Polygraph client machine using telnet Good luck, Alex. On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Thomas Proell wrote: > Hi! > I installed the Web Polygraph on my network, compiled it, > ran the "hello world" example - and was happy. It worked. > > Now, I want to work with Poly-Mix2 to do some real testing. > I installed the client on one computer (nelke), set its > default route to a router (bunuel) and set the server on > a third computer (godard). All computers are connected > by the same wire. > The router knows them both, so it should work. > > Then, I changed the workloads/polymix-2.pg so that the > two adresses appear there instead of the 10.som.ewh.at > dummy. > > The problem ist now, that it doesn't work. Only zeros > and "-1" appear as the output. Then > > "fyi: local phase 'warm' reached synchronisation point" > > again many zeros and rarely real numbers :-) > > > Running tcpdump on the router shows me that the client and > the server don't speak much. When they speak, I get the > numbers, but this is rare. > > > Then, there are errors like "CltXact.cc:399: error: > clocks out of sync" > > > What's going on here? Souldn't they send more traffic? > Have I forgotten anything? > > > Thomas > >