Re: ssl and polygraph

Alex Rousskov <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.web-polygraph.user
Message-ID <Pine.BSF.4.10.10011291127080.58951-100000@measurement-factory.com>
On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Paonia Ezrine wrote:

> lets say the squid box is not the bottle neck what kind of hit/sec can a
> single pentium 800 (running linux or FreeBSD) running polygrpah generate?

With PolyMix-3, you can get 400-700 req/sec (230-400 hit/sec), far
more than an average single Squid can handle. By altering
(simplifying) the workload, one can saturate 100Mbit link with a
single Polygraph pair.
 
> How much work would it be?

It would probably take about 7-14 days to develop a useable version,
assuming we can use the existing SSL libraries. The libraries'
encryption/decryption speed may be a problem here, but it can be
solved by adding more client server pairs, of course. Please contact
me off-list of you are interested.

> do you know of any other tools that would do this and fast and
> free? tried pagepoker and wtest both of too slow?

I read that the latest release of httperf had SSL support. Httperf
has somewhat different objectives from Polygraph, but may be worth a
try: 

	http://www.epm.ornl.gov/~sigmetrics/cgi-bin/viewmsg.cgi?id=8
	http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/David_Mosberger/httperf.html
	ftp://ftp.hpl.hp.com/pub/httperf/

Good luck,

Alex.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.