Re: ssl and polygraph
Alex Rousskov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.web-polygraph.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.BSF.4.10.10011291127080.58951-100000@measurement-factory.com> |
On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Paonia Ezrine wrote: > lets say the squid box is not the bottle neck what kind of hit/sec can a > single pentium 800 (running linux or FreeBSD) running polygrpah generate? With PolyMix-3, you can get 400-700 req/sec (230-400 hit/sec), far more than an average single Squid can handle. By altering (simplifying) the workload, one can saturate 100Mbit link with a single Polygraph pair. > How much work would it be? It would probably take about 7-14 days to develop a useable version, assuming we can use the existing SSL libraries. The libraries' encryption/decryption speed may be a problem here, but it can be solved by adding more client server pairs, of course. Please contact me off-list of you are interested. > do you know of any other tools that would do this and fast and > free? tried pagepoker and wtest both of too slow? I read that the latest release of httperf had SSL support. Httperf has somewhat different objectives from Polygraph, but may be worth a try: http://www.epm.ornl.gov/~sigmetrics/cgi-bin/viewmsg.cgi?id=8 http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/David_Mosberger/httperf.html ftp://ftp.hpl.hp.com/pub/httperf/ Good luck, Alex.