Re: SMP support
Alex Rousskov <[email protected]> Tue, 15 Jul 2014 11:33:01 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.web-polygraph.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 07/15/2014 09:58 AM, unjc email wrote:
> In the recent log change, I notice the latest private release has
> mentioned about "better SMP support". I would like to know more about
> the newly added feature. How capable does the latest version support
> SMP? Does it utilize multiple cores so that it is not necessary to
> start multiple Polyclt / Polysrv processes on a single box?
Not quite. Polygraph v4.8.0 makes it easier to use multiple processes on
the same box. Here is a list of the related features:
> * Added --worker command line option to specify SMP worker ID.
> * Support %worker macro in command line option values.
> * The local r.n.g. seed value now defaults to worker ID. This
> change does not affect old test scripts running new Polygraph
> versions because the default worker ID is one, same as the old
> local r.n.g. default.
> * Added worker() PGL function to return the current worker ID.
> * "${worker}" macro support in ips2names, credentials, URL traces.
> * pgl2ldif --worker ID command line option.
The plan is for Polygraph v4.9.0 to start those multiple processes
automatically so that you do not have to write a script to do that, but
there is currently no sponsor for that feature.
HTH,
Alex.
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users-mN9fGWdlm5pku/f+YMZH/di2O/[email protected]
http://www.web-polygraph.org/mailman/listinfo/users