> > BTW, I am trying to understand why, as a configuration
> > option, the current mechanism isn't suitable, as the configuration isn't
> > intended to be called on each invocation of the module?
>
> You'll have to ask the module author who requested this feature about
> this one :-) However, none of the core Webmin modules will use this new
> type, for the reasons you mentioned ..
>
I was hoping to get a response on this from the module author(s), but to
make things clean, this is an official request. Given the interesting
programatic and security issues with this feature, as well as previous
posts on the subject, why cannot the current mechanism be used, and if it
is just because the form is confusing, what would make the form clear?
I would hate to have an insecure feature implemented when all that was
needed was better language or structure.
Cheers!
---- Randy
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
-
Forwarded by the Webmin development list at [email protected]
To remove yourself from this list, go to
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.