Re: toggling http / https on static content?

Chuck Hill <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.webobjects.admin
Message-ID <[email protected]>
What I've always done was to not use DirectConnect, not go anywhere near
WOResourceMangler, and use a WebServer when developing.  Then there is no
switch.  You develop exactly as you will deploy and you can easily see if
the http/https links and transitioning are correct.  Windows users have a
legitimate whine in this area, but as a Mac user you have no excuse
whatsoever for not using Apache when developing.  It is pre-installed, all
you have to do is set up SSL support and there is an excellent page even
*I* could follow. :-)


Chuck


At 08:46 PM 11/02/2004 -0500, Lon Baker wrote:
>Chuck,
>
>One of my apps I implemented what you mentioned in the previous 
>message. I actually placed the static content (images, stylesheets, 
>etc.) on a web server and have links to them so that they are pulled 
>from the web server instead of through the WO server. I believe that 
>normally you can do this with the split install. I am actually looking 
>at placing it on a separate server and during development the links are 
>all non-SSL. In production the links need to be SSL I was just 
>wondering if anyone had any code to determine if and when to apply SSL 
>to a link for static content.
>
>On Feb 11, 2004, at 8:24 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
>> I'm confused.  What do you want to do?
>> --
>>
>> Chuck Hill                                 [email protected]
>> Global Village Consulting Inc.             
>> http://www.global-village.net
>
>
>Lon
>
>

--

Chuck Hill                                 [email protected]
Global Village Consulting Inc.             http://www.global-village.net
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.