Re: toggling http / https on static content?

I'm not a big fan of using split installs and WOResourceManager to serve
static content.  If you use it for the data binding, it fails if the
request is repeated such as some plugins do.  I prefer to just use a web
server and have no change between development and deployment.  That seems
like the most powerful and least problematic route.

I have no problems using WOResourceManager to access application or
framework resources such as config files and templates. Its the dynamic
data cache I am leery of and the changes related to use of DirectConnect.


Chuck


At 08:53 AM 12/02/2004 +0100, Georg Tuparev wrote:
>
>On Feb 12, 2004, at 2:57 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
>> What I've always done was to not use DirectConnect, not go anywhere 
>> near
>> WOResourceMangler, and use a WebServer when developing.  Then there is 
>> no
>> switch.
>
>Could you please elaborate on not touching WOResourceMangler? Not that 
>I am a big fan of it, but I do not recollect having trouble moving to 
>https while using it...
>
>-- georg --
>
>"War is God's way of teaching Americans about geography."
>Ambrose Bierce, writer (1842-1914)
>
>

--

Chuck Hill                                 [email protected]
Global Village Consulting Inc.             http://www.global-village.net