Re: timeout after long waiting
"Cheong Hee (DCQSS)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.webobjects.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <008601c62d34$9efce140$1800a8c0@chngxp> |
Really appreciate your prompt and detailed suggestions. As part of administration, I will need to dump schema and static data in database. Both direct connect and WOLongResponsePage are working fine. Thanks alot! Cheers Cheong Hee ----- Original Message ----- From: "Randy Wigginton" <[email protected]> To: "'Jerry W. Walker'" <[email protected]>; "'Cheong Hee (DCQSS)'" <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 11:47 PM Subject: RE: timeout after long waiting > Cheong, 2 minutes is an eternity on the internet. I can't imagine any > page > I would wait two minutes for. On the off chance that you are creating an > in-house application, and two minutes (or more) is acceptable, then I'd > suggest either the WOLongresponse page (as Jerry suggests) or using direct > connect. The advantage of direct connect (specifying the port) is that > the > browser does not time out. I've created "pages" (for my own use) that > have > taken 30-45 minutes to respond. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jerry W. Walker > Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 10:19 AM > To: Cheong Hee (DCQSS) > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: timeout after long waiting > > Hi, Cheong, > > The timeout is set in the browser and typically runs around 20 or 30 > seconds. At that point the browser closes its end of the socket > causing the server to throw this exception when your app attempts to > write into the other end of the socket. > > Since you can only set the default timeout for a tiny fraction of the > browsers that might hit your site, you're left with a couple > realistic options: > > * considerably shorten the processing time of the action invoked. > As nonsensical as this might sound, if the process is taking so long > because it's trying to display all the records it finds for some > criteria and that number of records is in the 1000's or more, you > might limit the records to the first 100 or so, since almost no one > really wants a few thousand records displayed. If you consider this > option seriously, you might find other ways to break up the > processing into responses to multiple requests, thereby shortening > the processing time. > > * if that fails, use the WOLongResponsePage. Not only will the > WOLongResponsePage continually refresh the browser page (at a refresh > time interval that you can choose) while your long running process is > running in the background, but you can even use it to provide a > (course grained) progress indicator on the status of your long > running process. > > Either approach can markedly improve the perceived response time of > your application, particularly if you run the processing for the > action in a lower priority thread for the latter option, since such a > long running action will otherwise block responses to other requests > that come in while it's running causing other users to wait for their > pages. This can become troublesome for the follow-on users if their > browser pages time out as well for simple requests. > > Regards, > Jerry > > On Feb 8, 2006, at 5:11 AM, Cheong Hee (DCQSS) wrote: > >> Could someone assis to solve this? >> >> [2006-02-08 18:01:30 SGT] <WorkerThread5> <WOWorkerThread id=5 >> socket=Socket[addr=/192.168.0.24,port=2213,localport=55558]> >> Exception while sending response: java.net.SocketException: >> Software caused connection abort: socket write error >> >> It happens when I have invoked an action in WOComponent, and the >> action takes a bit longer time to process (still less than 2 >> minutes). Before the process is ended, the browser had already >> gone into error page. The session timeout is much longer than the >> processing time. >> >> Appreciate any input. Thanks. >> >> Regards >> >> Cheong Hee >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> WebObjects-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev > > > -- > __ Jerry W. Walker, > WebObjects Developer/Instructor for High Performance Industrial > Strength Internet Enabled Systems > > [email protected] > 203 278-4085 office > > > > _______________________________________________ > WebObjects-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev >