Re: Necromail
Brian Willoughby <[email protected]> Sun, 15 Feb 2009 20:52:33 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.webobjects.eof |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Apparently there are a handful of us still subscribed. Personally, I haven't used WebObjects or EOF in a while, but I often think of projects which would benefit from EOF. I just don't seem to have time to work on these projects because of other projects taking priority (USB hardware design, firmware, CoreAudio, etc.) I also keep wondering whether CoreData really suffices as a substitute for EOF, or if so many features have been lost that I would find it annoying. I do hear stories of fellow engineers putting CoreData to good use, so I am hopeful. I have an old NEXTSTEP project which predates EOF which I tried several times to port unsuccessfully (unfortunately, I need to change the schema at the same time, and that's probably making the move too complex). These days, if I resurrect those efforts, I assume I would use CoreData. Is EOF still available for Apple? I must admit that I don't even know. For a while, I had a printout of a web page on Apple's site which offered the legacy ObjC WebObjects and EOF for sale. I doubt that offer is still available. EOF remains an example both of good object-oriented design, and of the advantages of Objective C. I don't think that C++ or Java or C# can handle the polymorphism inherent in the multiples layers of WebObjects built on EOF built on Foundation. Last I heard, the Java version of EOF had to rewrite the entire stack as a monolithic code base - which seems to make it harder to share the same code between desktop and web applications. So much for reusable code... Brian Willoughby Sound Consulting On Feb 15, 2009, at 16:13, Nat! wrote: Is this list still working ? Nothing in my inbox since 2006 ;)