Re: Reasons *not* to open source WebObjects?

Am 31.03.2005 um 04:54 schrieb Mark F. Murphy:

> Tapestry, for example, had time to learn from WO and do it better.  
> OGNL is a good case in point <http://www.ognl.org/>. This came out  
> of Apple's KVC... but is better.  It's more expressive.  This is an  
> area has not embraced or improved, but the OS community has!  
> Tapestry takes full advantage of it.

As does WO: just link the WOOgnl framework from Project Wonder and  
off you go.

Cheers, Anjo