Re: Future WebObjects JBoss/J2EE only?
Hugi Thordarson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.webobjects.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"An awesome thingamabob". It disturbs me that this is the best description of WO I've heard in quite a while :-). On 14.4.2005, at 17:24, Arturo Perez wrote: > Mark F. Murphy wrote: > >> At 12:57 PM -0400 4/14/05, Arturo Perez wrote: >>>> Apache. >>>> >>> Apache has never been considered an application server (it's far >>> more useful than that!). >> You didn't ask me about Application Servers. You asked about >> thingies within thingamabobs. > > That was implicit in the discussion, you know. Feel free to wriggle > all you like, however :-) > >> :) >> WebObjects doesn't even have a thingy. It's simply a single >> thingamabob. >> mark > > Yeah, but it's a really awesome one. > _______________________________________________ > WebObjects-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev